| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Academic Resources

Page history last edited by PBworks 17 years, 10 months ago

Academic Resources


 

 

You can click here for a Quick Introduction to The Clarity Concept.

 

These pages offer a range of papers and resources for researchers with an interest in the principles behind The Clarity Concept.

 

Papers

 

Visualisation

Cognative approaches

 

Biblograph

 

 

 

Clarkson, M. 1994. “A Risk Based Model of Stakeholder Theory.” Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto: 5

 

Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

 

Grunig, J. E. 1983. “Communication Behaviors and Attitudes of Environmental Publics: Two Studies.” Journalism Monographs, 81.

 

Grunig, J. E. 2005. “Situational Theory of Publics.” Encyclopedia of Public Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 778-780.

 

Hallahan, K. 2000. “Inactive Publics: The Forgotten Publics in Public Relations.” Public Relations Review 26(4): 499-515.

 

Rawlins, B. & Bowen, S. 2005. “Publics.” Encyclopedia of Public Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 718-721.

133-166.

 

Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Chicago: Swallow.

 

Dunham et al. 2001; Sternberg, E. 2001. “The Stakeholder Concept: A Mistaken Doctrine.” Foundation for Business Responsibilities.

 

Dunham, L., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2001). The soft underbelly of stakeholder theory: The role of community. Darden School Working Paper No. 01-22

 

Esman, M. 1972. “The Elements of Institution Building.” In J. W. Eaton (Ed), Institution Building and Development. Beverly Hills: Sage: 19-40;

 

Evan, W. 1976. “An Organization-Set Model of Interorganizational Relations.” In W. Evan (Ed), Interorganizational Relations. New York: Penguin:

 

Freeman, 1984; Savage, G.T., Nix, T.H., Whitehead, C.J., & Blair, J.D. 1991. “Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 19: 453-473;

 

Freeman, R. E. & McVea, J. 2001. “A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management” Darden Business School Working Paper No. 01-02.

 

Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

 

Freeman, R.E., & Reed, D.L. 1983. “Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance.”

 

Grunig, J. E. & Repper, F. C. 1992. “Strategic Management, Publics, and Issues,” In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates:

 

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T.1984. Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

 

Harrison, J.S., & St. John, C.H. 1994. Strategic Management of Organizations and Stakeholders. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co

 

Howse, J., Kent, S., Molina,F., Taylor, J (1999) Reasoning with Spider Diagrams In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (VL99). IEEE Computer Society Press, December 1999. University of Kent

 

Jennings, M. M. (1999). “Stakeholder theory: Letting anyone who’s interested run the business–no investment required.” Conference paper presented at Corporate Governance: Ethics Across the Board, Houston, TX, April 6 http://www.stthom.edu/cbes/marianne_jennings.html

 

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review, 22: 853-886.

 

Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., and Tannenbaum, P.H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957

 

Parsons, T. 1976. “Three Levels in the Hierarchical Structure of Organizations.” In W. Evan (Ed.), Interorganizational Relations New York: Penguin: 69-78.

 

Plowman, K. D., Briggs, W. G., & Huang Y.H. 2001. “Public Relations and Conflict Resolution.” In Robert Heath (Ed) Handbook of Public Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 301-310.

 

Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28.

 

Preston, L.E., & Sapienza, H.J. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. The Journal of

 

Rawlins, B. Prioritizing Stakeholders for Public Relations (2006)

 

Rokeach, M., The Nature of Human Values Free Press, New York (1973)

 

Guttman L 1950. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer et al. Measurement and Prediction. The American Soldier Vol. IV. New York: Wiley

 

Winn, M.I. 2001. “Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modeling Methodology,” Business & Society, 40:

 

Alternative approaches

 

Future 500

 

 

 

On-line references

 

 

  

Prioritizing Stakeholders for Public Relations by Brad L. Rawlins

 

 

An Introduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation

 

Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling and Management

 

Business Relationships as Value Drivers

 

How to do (or not to do) a stakeholder analysis. Guidance on how to do a stakeholder analysis, using lessons learnt from an analysis of alcohol policy development in Hungary - Varvasovszky and Brugha

 

 

Cognitive Mapping Methodology for Understanding of

Business Relationship Value

 

Stakeholder Democracy: Challenges and Contributions

from Accountancy

 

Benefits and Costs of Consumer Relationships: A Study of Professional Service Providers

 

 

Strategic Decision Support using Computerised Morphological Analysis From the Swedish Morphological Society

 

 

Arul, M. J., Attitude: Their Nature, Development and Change November 2001

 

Trochim, W. (1999). The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 1st Edition. Atomic Dog Publishing, Cincinnati October 2001

 

Institute for Objective Measurement

 

Stakeholder groups analysis of groups impacted by RYOGENS in Tower Hamlets

 

United Nations resource

 

Future 500 concepts

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.